
doi: 10.1111/pde.14034
pmid: 32462667
AbstractBackground/ObjectivesLittle research has compared clinician acne severity assessment with either adolescent‐ or parent‐rated scales of acne severity or impact on quality of life (QOL). We sought to assess how adolescents and their parents perceive the severity and impact of acne on the adolescent's QOL and correlate this with clinical severity.MethodsEach adolescent and a parent completed a validated QOL survey regarding the adolescent's acne and rated the adolescent's acne severity and QOL impact using a Likert scale. Clinicians assessed the adolescent's acne using a standardized acne severity scale. Statistical analysis compared adolescent scores with respective parent scores or with clinician assessment using a paired t test or Spearman rank‐order correlation test.ResultsThe Likert impact score more accurately reflected acne impact on QOL for adolescents than for parents when considering the validated QOL survey as the gold standard (r2 = .56 vs r2 = .36). Likert scores for adolescents and parents were weakly correlated for acne severity but not for acne QOL impact (r2 = .36 vs r2 = .18). Correlations of acne severity scores between clinician and either adolescent or parent were weak.ConclusionsParents and adolescents are in relative agreement regarding acne severity and QOL impact. However, parent and adolescent perceptions are disparate from clinician acne assessment. It is important that physicians identify and consider adolescent and parent perceptions in addition to clinical assessment to better inform the approach to acne management.
Parents, Adolescent, Surveys and Questionnaires, Acne Vulgaris, Quality of Life, Humans, Perception, Severity of Illness Index
Parents, Adolescent, Surveys and Questionnaires, Acne Vulgaris, Quality of Life, Humans, Perception, Severity of Illness Index
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
