
doi: 10.1111/pde.12348
pmid: 24890321
AbstractDiaper dermatitis (DD) is one of the most common skin conditions in neonates and infants, with a peak between the ages of 9 and 12 months. Appropriate skin care practices that support skin barrier function and protect the buttocks skin from urine and feces are supposed to be effective in the prevention ofDD. Despite many recommendations for parents and caregivers on proper diaper skin care, there is no up‐to‐date synthesis of the available evidence to develop recommendations forDDprevention practice. Therefore we performed a systematic literature review on the efficacy of nonmedical skin care practices on the diapered area of healthy, full‐term infants ages 0 to 24 months. We identified 13 studies covering skin care practices such as cleansing, bathing, and application of topical products.DDprevalence and incidence and physiologic skin parameters were used as efficacy parameters. The results of this review indicate that cleansing of the diaper area using baby wipes or water and a washcloth have comparable effects on diapered skin. Bathing with a liquid baby cleanser twice weekly seems comparable with water alone. The application of ointments containing zinc oxide or petrolatum with or without vitamin A seems to have comparable effects onDDseverity. There seems to be no information on whether single skin care practices such as cleansing, bathing, and application of topical preparations can preventDD. High‐quality randomized clinical trials are needed to show the effectiveness of skin care practices for controlling and preventingDD.
Diaper Rash, Administration, Topical, Child, Preschool, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Skin Care
Diaper Rash, Administration, Topical, Child, Preschool, Infant Care, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Skin Care
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 76 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
