
AbstractThe temperature responses of mesophyll conductance (gm) were investigated for nine species using carbon isotope techniques combining tunable diode laser spectroscopy and gas exchange measurements. Species included the evergreen trees Eucalyptus pauciflora and Quercus engelmannii; the tropical evergreen tree Lophostemon confertus; as well as the herbaceous species Nicotiana tabacum, Oryza sativa, Triticum aestivum, Gossypium hirsutum, Glycine max and Arabidopsis thaliana. Responses varied from a two‐ to threefold increase in mesophyll conductance between 15 and 40 °C observed for N. tabacum, G. hirsutum, G. max and E. pauciflora to almost no change in L. confertus and T. aestivum. To account for the different temperature responses between species, we suggest that there must be variation in both the activation energy for membrane permeability and the effective pathlength for liquid phase diffusion. Stomatal conductance was relatively independent of increases in leaf temperature and concomitant increases in leaf to air vapour pressure difference. Two exceptions were Eucalyptus and Gossypium, where stomatal conductance increased with temperature up to 35 °C despite increasing leaf to air vapour pressure. For a given species, temperature responses of stomatal and mesophyll conductance were independent of one another.
580, Carbon Isotopes, Cell Membrane Permeability, Chloroplasts, Temperature, Plant Transpiration, Carbon Dioxide, Models, Theoretical, carbon isotope discrimination, Plant Leaves, Magnoliopsida, co₂ diffusion, membrane permeability, Species Specificity, stomatal conductance, Vcmax, Plant Stomata, Mesophyll Cells
580, Carbon Isotopes, Cell Membrane Permeability, Chloroplasts, Temperature, Plant Transpiration, Carbon Dioxide, Models, Theoretical, carbon isotope discrimination, Plant Leaves, Magnoliopsida, co₂ diffusion, membrane permeability, Species Specificity, stomatal conductance, Vcmax, Plant Stomata, Mesophyll Cells
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 319 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
