Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Psychology and Psych...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice
Article . 2014 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Understanding process in group cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis

Authors: Lecomte, Tania; Leclerc, Claude; Wykes, Til; Nicole, Luc; Abdel Baki, Amal;

Understanding process in group cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis

Abstract

Background Group cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis ( GCBT p) has shown to be effective in diminishing symptoms, as well as in improving other psychosocial dimensions such as self‐esteem. But little is known regarding the processes that generate these therapeutic improvements and might be harnessed to further improve its effectiveness. Objectives The current study aimed at investigating these processes, particularly those linked to interpersonal relationships. Design The participants were all assessed at baseline, were given 24 sessions of GCBT p over the course of 3 months and were assessed again at post‐treatment as well as 6 months later (9 months from baseline). Method Sixty‐six individuals with early psychosis took part in a study of GCBT p where therapist alliance and group cohesion were assessed at three time points during the therapy, and punctual (each session) self‐perceptions on symptoms and optimism were collected. Results Improvements in symptoms (BPRS), self‐esteem (SERS‐SF) and in self‐perceived therapeutic improvements (CHOICE) were linked to specific aspects of the alliance, group cohesion, as well as optimism. The variables retained were not always overall scores, suggesting the importance of the variables at key moments during the therapy. Conclusions The results clearly demonstrate the importance of the alliance and group cohesion, together significantly explaining improvements measured at post‐therapy or follow‐up. Practitioner points This study has attempted to focus mostly on relational aspects, as well as on self‐perceptions, in the context of a GCBT p for individuals with early psychosis. This study also showed that these therapeutic relationships are especially useful when they are more stable and at specific moments during the therapy, namely when more difficult psychological work is done.

Country
United Kingdom
Keywords

self-esteem, Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Group cognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, 150, interpersonal relationships, 610, Self Concept, Treatment Outcome, Psychotic Disorders, therapeutic improvements, Psychotherapy, Group, symptoms, Humans, Female, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, self-perceived therapeutic improvements

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!