
doi: 10.1111/pala.70056
Abstract The Pseudosuchia (Diapsida, Archosauria) arose during the Early Triassic and were the dominant large to medium‐sized tetrapods in continental ecosystems until the Triassic–Jurassic extinction. Despite this important palaeoecological role, the group remains poorly examined. Here, we report several palaeobiological, palaeoecological and phylogenetic implications based on the bone histology of appendicular elements of seven species of non‐crocodylomorph Pseudosuchia from South America, and provide a review of the current state of the osteohistological research on this group. Saurosuchus galilei (Paracrocodylomorpha, Loricata) and Sillosuchus longicervix (Paracrocodylomorpha, Poposauroidea) exhibit fibrolamellar complexes, showing extremely rapid growth. Similarly, Aetobarbakinoides brasiliensis (Aetosauria) and Gracilisuchus stipanicicorum (Gracilisuchidae) display woven‐fibred bone, indicative of fast growth. However, Aetosaourides scagliai (Aetosauria) and Tarjadia ruthae (Erpetosuchidae) developed both woven‐fibred and parallel fibred bone, which implies an intermediate or moderate growth rate. Finally, Riojasuchus tenuisceps (Ornithosuchidae) records parallel‐fibred bone mostly, marking a slower growth rate. Nevertheless, when compared with other pseudosuchians worldwide, this diversity in growth rate does not indicate a reduction in growth rate within the lineage from stem towards crown Pseudosuchia (i.e. a phylogenetic signal). Neither does it correspond with estimated global palaeoclimatic patterns but instead seems to respond to more local environmental influences (e.g. seasonality) and to intrinsic physiological issues. In general, the diversity seen in the growth dynamics of the Triassic non‐crocodylomorph Pseudosuchia from South America is similar to that reported for North America and Europe.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
