
doi: 10.1111/pai.14258
pmid: 39396116
Abstract Background Infants aged <1 year with confirmed food allergies generally need to avoid causative foods completely for a certain period. Low‐dose oral food challenges (LD‐OFCs) may be an effective strategy for safely introducing small amounts of causative foods to individuals with food allergies. This study clarified the safety of LD‐OFCs in infants aged <1 year with food allergies. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of LD‐OFCs performed in infants aged <1 year allergic to hen's egg, cow's milk, or wheat between April 2014 and October 2017. Approximately 1/25th–1/20th of the egg white from a heated whole hen's egg, 3 mL heated cow's milk, and 2 g wheat noodles (udon) were used as challenge foods. We examined the LD‐OFC results, including the induced symptoms and treatment required for positive LD‐OFC results. Results The LD‐Egg, LD‐Milk, and LD‐Wheat OFC groups comprised 68, 42, and 13 participants, respectively. The positivity rates for the LD‐Egg, LD‐Milk, and LD‐Wheat OFC groups were 7%, 24%, and 0%, respectively. Patients predominantly exhibited skin symptoms, and most were treated with oral antihistamines alone. None of the patients experienced anaphylaxis or required adrenaline injections. Conclusions Infants aged <1 year with food allergies can safely undergo LD‐OFCs by consuming low doses of causative foods. Avoiding the complete elimination of causative foods is an important strategy for managing infants with food allergies when initially introducing causative foods.
Male, Infant, Administration, Oral, Wheat Hypersensitivity, Allergens, Milk, Humans, Animals, Female, Immunization, Milk Hypersensitivity, Egg Hypersensitivity, Food Hypersensitivity, Retrospective Studies
Male, Infant, Administration, Oral, Wheat Hypersensitivity, Allergens, Milk, Humans, Animals, Female, Immunization, Milk Hypersensitivity, Egg Hypersensitivity, Food Hypersensitivity, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
