
doi: 10.1111/padm.12300
handle: 10067/1394960151162165141
AbstractGovernments across the globe try to rebalance their budgets by rationalizing overhead operations. When overhead‐reducing policies are adopted, it is important to understand why some central government organizations have a higher overhead than others, and why organizational models to produce overhead efficiencies are used to different degrees. This study focuses on the Flemish context to analyse differences between central government organizations in the size and organization of two overhead processes: human resources management (HRM) and finance and control (FIN). Significant effects are found for autonomy, organizational size, spatial dispersion and budgetary stress, yet effects vary according to whether HRM or FIN is considered and whether the focus is on the size or the organization of HRM or FIN. Our findings have practical implications to get a process‐sensitive understanding of the size and organization of overhead, and theoretical implications as they cast light on factors that shape decision‐making in public organizations.
OWNERSHIP, ADMINISTRATIVE INTENSITY, Public Administration, Political Science, Politics, Social Sciences, Political Science & Public Administration, DELEGATION, RATIOS, 1606 Political Science, EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS, Overhead, Public organizations, human resources management, financial management, 4407 Policy and administration, 4408 Political science, Government & Law, 1503 Business and Management, HUMAN-RESOURCES, MANAGEMENT, Law, GOVERNMENT, MATTER, 1605 Policy and Administration
OWNERSHIP, ADMINISTRATIVE INTENSITY, Public Administration, Political Science, Politics, Social Sciences, Political Science & Public Administration, DELEGATION, RATIOS, 1606 Political Science, EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS, Overhead, Public organizations, human resources management, financial management, 4407 Policy and administration, 4408 Political science, Government & Law, 1503 Business and Management, HUMAN-RESOURCES, MANAGEMENT, Law, GOVERNMENT, MATTER, 1605 Policy and Administration
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
