
doi: 10.1111/pace.12211
pmid: 23808816
Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) play a vital role in the management of cardiac rhythm disturbances. The devices are comprised of two primary components: a generator and lead joined by a connector. Original pacemaker lead connectors were created de novo at the time of implantation or replacement and were very unreliable. With the development of new lead designs, creation of a standard connector configuration, the IS‐1 connector became mandatory. Similar connector development also occurred with the advent of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), resulting in creation of the high voltage standard: the DF‐1 connector. Differing from a pacemaker lead, the ICD lead connector requires one IS‐1 connector and one or two DF‐1 connectors, resulting in a large cumbersome lead connector and generator header block. Recently, a revolutionary quad pole single plug connector standard has been approved for market release. These are the single‐pin DF4 and IS4 lead connectors that carry low‐ and high‐voltage poles or all low‐voltage poles, respectively. These connectors, together with new labeling guidelines, have simplified operative procedures and reduced errors, when mating lead connectors into the generator's connector block.
Systems Integration, Pacemaker, Artificial, Medical Errors, Electric Conductivity, Equipment Design, Defibrillators, Implantable, Electrodes, Implanted
Systems Integration, Pacemaker, Artificial, Medical Errors, Electric Conductivity, Equipment Design, Defibrillators, Implantable, Electrodes, Implanted
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
