
Abstract Background/Objectives Tooth agenesis (TA) is among the most common malformations in humans. Although several causative mutations have been described, the genetic cause often remains elusive. Here, we test whether whole genome sequencing (WGS) could bridge this diagnostic gap. Methods In four families with TA, we assessed the dental phenotype using the Tooth Agenesis Code after intraoral examination and radiographic and photographic documentation. We performed WGS of index patients and subsequent segregation analysis. Results We identified two variants of uncertain significance (a potential splice variant in PTH1R , and a 2.1 kb deletion abrogating a non‐coding element in FGF7 ) and three pathogenic variants: a novel frameshift in the final exon of PITX2 , a novel deletion in PAX9 , and a known nonsense variant in WNT10A . Notably, the FGF7 variant was found in the patient, also featuring the WNT10A variant. While mutations in PITX2 are known to cause Axenfeld‐Rieger syndrome 1 (ARS1) predominantly featuring ocular findings, accompanied by dental malformations, we found the PITX2 frameshift in a family with predominantly dental and varying ocular findings. Conclusion Severe TA predicts a genetic cause identifiable by WGS. Final exon PITX2 frameshifts can cause a predominantly dental form of ARS1.
Male, Homeodomain Proteins, Medizin und Gesundheit, Whole Genome Sequencing, tooth development, Exons, Pedigree, Wnt Proteins, Phenotype, molecular genetics, Homeobox Protein PITX2, genomics, Humans, Female, genetics, PAX9 Transcription Factor, oligodontia, Frameshift Mutation, growth/development, Anodontia, Transcription Factors
Male, Homeodomain Proteins, Medizin und Gesundheit, Whole Genome Sequencing, tooth development, Exons, Pedigree, Wnt Proteins, Phenotype, molecular genetics, Homeobox Protein PITX2, genomics, Humans, Female, genetics, PAX9 Transcription Factor, oligodontia, Frameshift Mutation, growth/development, Anodontia, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
