Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Orthodontics and Cra...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Three‐Dimensional Effects of Two Minimally Invasive Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Techniques

Authors: Bibiana Mello da Rosa; Orion Luiz Haas; Rubens Martins Bastos; Rogério Belle de Oliveira; Federico Hernández‐Alfaro; Adaia Valls‐Ontañón; Luciane Macedo de Menezes;

Three‐Dimensional Effects of Two Minimally Invasive Surgically Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Techniques

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study evaluated, in three dimensions, the skeletal effects of two minimally invasive bone‐anchored techniques for surgically assisted palatal expansion, with and without pterygomaxillary disjunction (PD) and nasal septum disinsertion (NSD). Materials and Methods Thirty‐nine patients were retrospectively selected from two centres and assigned to groups: G1 (without PD and NSD) and G2 (with PD and NSD). Cone‐beam computed tomography scans were analysed before and after expansion, using landmarks to assess skeletal changes along the transverse ( X ), vertical ( Y ) and anteroposterior ( Z ) planes. Results Both groups achieved significant transverse expansion, with no intergroup difference ( p = 0.062). G1 showed significant anterior transverse asymmetry (1.4 ± 2.9 mm; p = 0.017). G2 exhibited significant inferior displacement (1.5 ± 1.6 mm right, 1.4 ± 1.5 mm left; p = 0.007, p = 0.009) and anterior displacement (0.8 ± 0.8 mm bilaterally; p = 0.005), although intergroup comparisons were not statistically significant ( p = 0.071 and p = 0.075, respectively). Both groups showed downward displacement of the apices and incisal edges of the upper central incisors, along with mild anterior movement of the posterior nasal spine and dental landmarks. Conclusion The two techniques produced similar skeletal effects across all three‐dimensional axes. A slight clockwise rotation of the maxilla was observed, consistent with previous reports on conventional surgically assisted maxillary expansion. Anterior asymmetry was significant in G1 and may warrant further investigation. Although some displacement tendencies were observed, current evidence does not indicate a clear advantage of one technique over the other.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid