
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12548
pmid: 34825769
AbstractObjectivePatients with oligodontia frequently show different types of malocclusions. However, how oligodontia affects the maxillofacial growth remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the maxillofacial morphological characteristics in growing patients with oligodontia.Setting and Sample PopulationThe study subjects included 33 Japanese children with non‐syndromic oligodontia (14 boys and 19 girls; mean age: 10.2 years) who visited the orthodontic clinic of Fukuoka Dental College Medical and Dental Hospital from 1999 to 2019.Materials and MethodsCephalometric analyses were performed, and the variables measured in each subject were converted intoZscores in relation to the mean and standard deviation of the Japanese norms matched for growth stage. The one‐samplet‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was performed to compare the mean scores in the patients with oligodontia with those of the Japanese norms.ResultsCompared with the Japanese norms, patients with oligodontia showed a smaller convexity and larger A‐B plane and SNB angles. The Frankfort‐mandibular plane and gonial angles were smaller, whereas the height of the ramus was larger. The vertical height of the alveolar bone in the maxillary and mandibular incisors and molar areas was smaller in patients with oligodontia.ConclusionsPatients with oligodontia showed Class III skeletal tendency with mandibular prognathism and flattened mandibular plane with a smaller gonial angle. These maxillofacial morphological features can be induced by a deficiency in the vertical growth of the alveolar bone in the maxillary and mandibular molar areas due to the lack of tooth germs.
Incisor, Male, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Cephalometry, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Mandible, Child, Anodontia
Incisor, Male, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Cephalometry, Maxilla, Humans, Female, Mandible, Child, Anodontia
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
