
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12106
pmid: 26412045
Structured AbstractObjectivesThe viscoelastic response of the midpalatal suture during maxillary expansion treatment has been sparsely studied. The aim of our study was to use viscoelastic models to investigate the effect of appliance mechanics on sutural tissue.Materials and MethodsFour creep‐strain models were utilized in predicting the midpalatal suture's response to a constant‐force application during expansion treatment. The functional forms included a three‐term separable, three‐term inseparable, two‐term inseparable, and single‐term arrangement. The functions were then transformed into subsequent stress‐relaxation representations to predict suture response as a result of 0.25, 0.20, 0.15, and 0.10 mm displacements. Finally, the single‐term creep‐strain representation was altered to simulate treatment decaying force during treatment. A force that decays 30 and 10% of an initially applied 0.98 N was considered for decaying functions over a 6‐week period, and compared to strain resulting from a constant‐force application.ResultsThis analysis illustrated that the decay in suture strain closely followed decay in force and that the path of decay had minimal impact on overall results. Also, it was found that a single screw activation would likely not cause suture soft tissue failure, even for a 0.25 mm displacement, and that suture stress rapidly decayed within minutes of activation.ConclusionResults from this study support the notion of maintaining a low‐magnitude constant traction on the suture during treatment to avoid soft tissue failure and promote tissue remodeling.
Palatal Expansion Technique, Sutures, Palate, Humans, Cranial Sutures
Palatal Expansion Technique, Sutures, Palate, Humans, Cranial Sutures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
