
AbstractThis paper aims to provide a better understanding of the causal structure in a multivariate time series by introducing several statistical procedures for testing indirect and spurious causal effects. In practice, detecting these effects is a complicated task, since the auxiliary variables that transmit/induce indirect/spurious causality are very often unknown. The availability of hundreds of economic variables makes this task even more difficult since it is generally infeasible to find the appropriate auxiliary variables among all the available ones. In addition, including hundreds of variables and their lags in a regression equation is technically difficult. The paper proposes several statistical procedures to test for the presence of indirect/spurious causality based on big data analysis. Furthermore, it suggests an identification procedure to find the variables that transmit/induce the indirect/spurious causality. Finally, it provides an empirical application where 135 economic variables were used to study a possible indirect causality from money/credit to income.
Pattern Classification, 330, Economics, Physics, Social Sciences, Neural Network Fundamentals and Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer science, Quantum mechanics, Decision Sciences, Data science, FOS: Economics and business, Big data, Artificial Intelligence, Causality (physics), Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Granger causality, Time Series Forecasting Methods, Econometrics, Data mining
Pattern Classification, 330, Economics, Physics, Social Sciences, Neural Network Fundamentals and Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer science, Quantum mechanics, Decision Sciences, Data science, FOS: Economics and business, Big data, Artificial Intelligence, Causality (physics), Computer Science, Physical Sciences, Granger causality, Time Series Forecasting Methods, Econometrics, Data mining
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
