
doi: 10.1111/nph.70039
pmid: 40051377
Summary Parallel evolution of the same, or at least very similar, phenotype(s) in different lineages is often interpreted as evidence for the action of natural selection. However, caution is required when inferring parallel evolution based on uncertain or potentially incorrect phylogenetic frameworks. Here, by conducting extensive phylogenomic and population genetic analyses, we aim to clarify the evolutionary history of spurless taxa within the Aquilegia ecalcarata complex. We observed substantial discordance in the phylogenetic patterns across the entire genome, primarily attributed to ancient introgression and incomplete lineage sorting. Additionally, we identified several spurless lineages whose phylogenetic positions were distorted by admixture events. Using a backbone tree and demographic modeling, we determined that these spurless taxa independently originated twice within this group. Intriguingly, our investigation revealed that the spurless taxa experienced population expansion during global cooling, while their spurred sister groups underwent population contraction. The parallel losses of petal spurs, therefore, may be linked to adaptations for low‐temperature conditions. These findings emphasize the importance of comprehensive population‐level analyses in phylogenetic inference and provide valuable insights into the dynamics of trait loss and its implications for the adaptive strategies.
Aquilegia, Flowers, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny
Aquilegia, Flowers, Biological Evolution, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
