
doi: 10.1111/nph.17757
pmid: 34601732
Summary Past studies have established mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO 2 ( g m ) as a variable and significant limitation to plant photosynthesis under steady‐state conditions. However, the role of g m in influencing photosynthesis ( A ) during the transient period of light induction is largely unknown. We combined gas exchange measurements with laser‐enabled carbon isotope discrimination measurements to assess g m during photosynthetic induction, using Arabidopsis as the measurement species. Our measurements revealed three key findings: (1) we found that the rate at which g m approached steady state during induction was not necessarily faster than the induction rate of the carboxylation process, contradictory to what has been suggested in previous studies; (2) g m displayed a strong and consistent coordination with A under both induction and steady‐state settings, hinting that the mechanism driving g m – A coupling does not require physiological stability as a prerequisite; and (3) photosynthetic limitation analysis of our data revealed that when integrated over the entire induction period, the relative limitation of A imposed by g m can be as high as > 35%. The present study provides the first demonstration of the important role of g m in limiting CO 2 assimilation during photosynthetic induction, thereby pointing to a need for more research attention to be devoted to g m in future induction studies.
Diffusion, Plant Leaves, Arabidopsis, Carbon Dioxide, Photosynthesis, Mesophyll Cells
Diffusion, Plant Leaves, Arabidopsis, Carbon Dioxide, Photosynthesis, Mesophyll Cells
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 53 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
