
doi: 10.1111/nph.15636
pmid: 30729582
This article is a Commentary on Both et al., 221: 1853–1865.
tropical forests, forest structure and composition, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, forest degradation, Plant Biology & Botany, Forestry, Nutrients, Biological Sciences, Forests, Plants, logging, terrestrial biosphere models, Soil, plant traits, ecosystem function, old-growth forests
tropical forests, forest structure and composition, Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, forest degradation, Plant Biology & Botany, Forestry, Nutrients, Biological Sciences, Forests, Plants, logging, terrestrial biosphere models, Soil, plant traits, ecosystem function, old-growth forests
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
