
doi: 10.1111/nph.14827
pmid: 29271039
SummaryClassical DNAJ proteins are co‐chaperones that together with HSP70s control protein homeostasis. All three classical types of DNAJ proteins (DNAJA, DNAJB and DNAJC types) possess the J‐domain for interaction with HSP70. DNAJA proteins contain, in addition, both the zinc‐finger motif and the C‐terminal domain which are involved in substrate binding, while DNAJB retains only the latter and DNAJC comprises only the J‐domain. There is increasing evidence that some of the activities of DNAJ proteins do not require the J‐domain, highlighting the functional significance of the other two domains. Indeed, the so‐called DNAJ‐like proteins with a degenerate J‐domain have been previously coined as DNAJD proteins, and also proteins containing only a DNAJ‐like zinc‐finger motif appear to be involved in protein homeostasis. Therefore, we propose to extend the classification of DNAJ‐related proteins into three different groups. The DNAJD type comprises proteins with a J‐like domain only, and has 15 members in Arabidopsis thaliana, whereas proteins of the DNAJE (33 Arabidopsis members) and DNAJF (three Arabidopsis members) types contain a DNAJA‐like zinc‐finger domain and DNAJA/B‐like C‐terminal domain, respectively. Here, we provide an overview of the entire repertoire of these proteins in A. thaliana with respect to their physiological function and possible evolutionary origin.
Arabidopsis Proteins, Arabidopsis, HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins, Conserved Sequence, Phylogeny
Arabidopsis Proteins, Arabidopsis, HSP40 Heat-Shock Proteins, Conserved Sequence, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 96 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
