Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Neurogastroenterolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

What elements in the physician‐patient relationship (PPR) contribute to patient satisfaction: Development of a short form PPRS‐Patient Version (PPRS‐Patient SF) Questionnaire

Authors: Douglas A. Drossman; Olafur Palsson; Ellen Stein; Johannah Ruddy; Anne Marie O'Broin Lennon;

What elements in the physician‐patient relationship (PPR) contribute to patient satisfaction: Development of a short form PPRS‐Patient Version (PPRS‐Patient SF) Questionnaire

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPast research suggests that patient‐provider relationships play a crucial role in patient satisfaction with their medical care. However, the essential relationship elements responsible for this effect have not been elucidated and were examined in this study.MethodsPatients in six gastroenterology clinics at a major medical center completed an anonymous, secure Internet survey about their medical care after a clinic visit. The survey included the validated Satisfaction With Care Scale‐37 (SAT‐37) and Patient‐Physician Relationship Scale (PPRS). Correlations between those scales were calculated, and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by regression analysis was used to create a PPRS Short Form (PPRS‐SF) specifically to account for satisfaction with care.Key results173 patients (114 females and 59 males; mean age 49.2 years) completed the survey. A range of specific patient‐doctor relationship aspects on the PPRS substantially influenced the patients' satisfaction scores. These are grouped into five EFA‐derived patient perception factors about their physicians: Competence, Connection, Professionalism, Considerateness, and Willingness/ability to make needed outside referrals. A brief 12‐item PPRS‐SF questionnaire was constructed that explained 63% of the variance in patients' satisfaction with their care. In contrast, the patients' clinical and demographic characteristics had little explanatory value regarding their satisfaction.Conclusions & InferencesOur findings strongly support the notion that the patient‐physician relationship's quality is the principal driver of gastroenterology patients' satisfaction with their care. The new PPRS‐SF is a convenient tool for clinicians and healthcare systems to assess the essential relationship factors that ensure satisfied patients.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Patient Satisfaction, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Ambulatory Care Facilities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    20
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
20
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!