
doi: 10.1111/njb.03535
The concept of epitypes was introduced to resolve the cases when the primary type of a plant name (holotype, lectotype or neotype) is demonstrably ambiguous and cannot be identified to the appropriate taxonomic level. In spite of the original intention, epitypes have been widely used as a means to complement the primary type with other morphological characters or as a ‘phylogenetic type' (a reference specimen used for DNA sequencing). The lack of any procedure to control or supersede the designated epitypes opens the possibility for their gross misuse as a replacement type, which has already taken place. The current usage of epitypes is discussed and a possible solution is suggested to amend the concept of epitypes in conformity with their dominant usage and the traditions of botanical history.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
