Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Molecular Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Molecular Ecology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2025
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: PubMed Central
https://doi.org/10.22541/au.17...
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2025
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

Genome Architecture and Speciation in Plants and Animals

Authors: Silu Wang; Judith Mank; Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos; Loren Rieseberg;

Genome Architecture and Speciation in Plants and Animals

Abstract

ABSTRACT There have been numerous treatments of specific topics in speciation, but surprisingly few papers have compared patterns and processes of speciation across different organismal groups. In this review, we partially address this gap by asking how variation in genome architecture impacts speciation across the plant and animal kingdoms. First, we briefly summarise what is known about speciation in these groups; importantly, the diversification rate of plants is about twice that of animals, and species barriers in plants may arise at an earlier stage of divergence. Next, we discuss several of the major differences in how plant and animal genomes evolve, and how they may impact the evolution of reproductive barriers and potentially speciation rates. Key differences include (1) a higher frequency of whole‐genome duplications (WGDs) and more rapid loss of synteny in plants; (2) a higher incidence and greater divergence of sex chromosomes in animals; (3) greater rates of sequence change, but slower rates of structural evolution, in animal relative to plant mitochondrial genomes; and (4) an often higher abundance of transposable elements (TEs) in plant genomes. Overall, we find the genomes of plants diverge much more rapidly in structure than those of animals (although there are many exceptions), perhaps contributing to a more rapid emergence of barriers to gene flow in plants. However, we also found that comparisons of genome evolution between the kingdoms are hampered by inconsistency in the methods employed, as well as in the metrics used to report on rates of structural evolution. Another theme from our review is the huge variation in genome architecture within each kingdom. While this variation complicates broad generalisations, it enables powerful comparative analyses that link differences in genome architecture to patterns and processes of speciation.

Keywords

genome architecture, Sex Chromosomes, plants, Genetic Speciation, reproductive isolation, Plants, Synteny, animals, Evolution, Molecular, 1105 Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 1311 Genetics, speciation, Genome, Mitochondrial, DNA Transposable Elements, Animals, Special Section: Genomics of Speciation, Genome, Plant

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
hybrid