Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Marine Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Marine Ecology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Relative Growth and Morphological Sexual Maturity in Four Ghost Shrimp Species (Decapoda, Axiidea)

Authors: Wyllyane Gonçalves da Silva; Renata Akemi Shinozaki‐Mendes; Nidia Cristiane Melo Marinho; Larissa Bacelar Costa; Marcos Antonio Lima Matoso; Mônica Lúcia Botter‐Carvalho;

Relative Growth and Morphological Sexual Maturity in Four Ghost Shrimp Species (Decapoda, Axiidea)

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study presents a comparative analysis of relative growth and morphological maturity in four species of ghost shrimps (Decapoda: Axiidea) from the tropical coast of Pernambuco, Brazil: Lepidophthalmus siriboia , Neocallichirus maryae , Fragillianassa fragilis and Callichirus corruptus . A total of 4696 individuals were sampled across four beaches. The relative growth was analysed based on certain morphometric relationships between independent (cephalothorax length, CL; dorsal oval, DO) and dependent variables (total length, TL; propodus length of the major cheliped, PL; propodus height, PH; propodus width, PW). Relative growth was evaluated separately for juveniles and adults of both sexes, using allometric modelling. In general, males and females reached adulthood at similar sizes, although females tended to be slightly smaller than males. At the two sampling sites where populations of C. corruptus were analysed, sizes at maturity were 5.31 and 6.53 mm DO for males and 4.82 and 7.0 mm DO for females. In L. siriboia , N. maryae and F. fragilis , sizes at maturity for males and females were 6.33 and 6.0 mm CL, 9.36 and 9.37 mm CL and 3.13 and 2.9 mm CL, respectively. Although females were significantly larger in overall body size (TL), they possessed smaller chelipeds. Cheliped growth (PL) was more pronounced during the juvenile stage in females, whereas in males, growth was evident in both juvenile and adult stages. Body growth of males increased more slowly during adulthood in L. siriboia , N. maryae and F. fragilis , while females showed the opposite trend. These variations in growth patterns and reproductive traits likely reflect environmental adaptations and biological trade‐offs that enhance fitness within each species' ecological niche. These findings highlight the importance of comparative morphometric approaches in assessing population structure and ecological responses.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid