
doi: 10.1111/luts.12120
pmid: 28868663
handle: 20.500.12831/38140 , 20.500.12418/6702 , 20.500.12445/751
doi: 10.1111/luts.12120
pmid: 28868663
handle: 20.500.12831/38140 , 20.500.12418/6702 , 20.500.12445/751
ObjectivesTo describe the coping strategies and help‐seeking behaviors of women and men with urinary incontinence (UI).MethodsIn cross‐sectional study, 156 women and 106 men Turkish with UI were interviewed using a questionnaire covering 29 questions.ResultsIt was determined that 50.6% of women and 34.0% of men seek help in first for treatment of UI. Forty eight percent of men consulted a physician in the first 6 months after the UI occurred, 44.9% of women consulted a physician 2–5 years later after the UI occurred. Coping behaviors of both groups for management of the UI were as follows: keeping feet warm, performing hot application to perineum, reducing the amount of daily drinking water, using pad, cloth pads, restricting physical activity, refraining from social life and praying etc.ConclusionsWhile women mostly do not prefer to seek medical advice for UI, men tend to go to doctors more often than women. Except for treatment seeking behaviors, both men and women are practicing coping methods for the management of UI such as going frequently to the toilet, keeping feet warm, hot application to perineum etc.
360, Male, urinary incontinence, Health Status, Gender, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, coping, help-seeking behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Help-Seeking Behavior, Urinary Incontinence, Adaptation, Psychological, gender, Humans, Female, Coping
360, Male, urinary incontinence, Health Status, Gender, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, coping, help-seeking behavior, Cross-Sectional Studies, Help-Seeking Behavior, Urinary Incontinence, Adaptation, Psychological, gender, Humans, Female, Coping
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
