
doi: 10.1111/lam.13201
pmid: 31357240
Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus, two bacterial strains commonly associated with biofilm-related medical infections and food poisoning, can rapidly colonize biotic and abiotic surfaces. The present study investigates the ability of anodic alumina surfaces with nanoporous surface topography to minimize the attachment and biofilm formation mediated by these pathogenic bacterial strains. Early attachment and subsequent biofilm development were retarded on surfaces with nanopores of 15-25 nm in diameter compared to surfaces with 50-100 nm pore diameter and nanosmooth surfaces. After 30 min of incubation in nutritive media, the biomass accumulation per unit surface area was 2·93 ± 1·72 µm3 µm-2 for the 15 nm, 3·49 ± 1·97 µm3 µm-2 for the 25 nm, as compared to 14·04 ± 6·39 µm3 µm-2 for the nanosmooth, 11·88 ± 9·72 µm3 µm-2 for the 50 nm and 12·09 ± 11·84 µm3 µm-2 for the 100 nm surfaces respectively. These findings suggest that anodic alumina with small size nanoscale pores could reduce the incidence of staphylococcal biofilms and infections, and shows promise as a material for a variety of medical applications and food contact surfaces. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This paper reports on a simple, robust and scientifically sound method to reduce attachment and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis to abiotic surfaces using a carefully designed nanoscale topography. This approach can help to reduce the incidence of staphylococcal biofilms and infections without imposing selective stresses on bacteria, thus preventing the creation of resistant strains.
Nanopores, Staphylococcus aureus, Biofilms, Aluminum Oxide, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcal Infections, Bacterial Adhesion
Nanopores, Staphylococcus aureus, Biofilms, Aluminum Oxide, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcal Infections, Bacterial Adhesion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
