
doi: 10.1111/jtsa.12743
Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model and its variations have been widely adopted in the study of financial volatilities, while the extension of GARCH‐type models to high‐dimensional data is always difficult because of over‐parameterization and computational complexity. In this article, we propose a multi‐variate GARCH‐type model that can simplify the parameterization by utilizing the network structure that can be appropriately specified for certain types of high‐dimensional data. The asymmetry in the dynamics of volatilities is also considered as our model adopts a threshold structure. To enable our model to handle data with extremely high dimension, we investigate the near‐epoch dependence (NED) of our model, and the asymptotic properties of our quasi‐maximum‐likelihood‐estimator (QMLE) are derived from the limit theorems for NED random fields. Simulations are conducted to test our theoretical results. At last we fit our model to log‐returns of four groups of stocks and the results indicate that bad news is not necessarily more influential on volatility if the network effects are considered.
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), 330, Inference from stochastic processes, network structure, high-dimensional time series, random field, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, threshold GARCH, Mathematics, multi-variate GARCH, heteroscedasticity
Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), 330, Inference from stochastic processes, network structure, high-dimensional time series, random field, Factor analysis and principal components; correspondence analysis, threshold GARCH, Mathematics, multi-variate GARCH, heteroscedasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
