
doi: 10.1111/jsap.13473
pmid: 35015298
ObjectiveTo assess the outcome and safety of surgically placed artificial urethral sphincters in male dogs with urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence.Materials and MethodsWe included dogs with urethral sphincter mechanism incompetence treated by placing an artificial urethral sphincter from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2017. The continence score (scale 1 to 5, with 5 indicating complete continence) was evaluated before and after implantation. Follow‐up information was obtained from the institution's medical records (short‐term up to 12 months) and questionnaires were completed by telephone (long‐term ≥12 months) for evaluation.ResultsMedical therapy was unsuccessful in 18 dogs and unknown in one dog before the artificial urethral sphincter placement. Short‐term continence improved in 16 of the 19 (84%) dogs. Four patients were lost to follow‐up. Nine of 15 (60%) dogs showed long‐term continence improvement, eight of 15 (53%) remained completely continent. The median follow‐up was 1785 (range 2 to 3234) days. The complication rate was 56% (9/16). Minor complications, including haematoma, stranguria/temporary dyssynergia and mild inflammation at the port, were reported in four of 16 (25%) dogs. Five of 16 (31%) experienced major complications, including stranguria/mechanical urethral obstruction, persistent dyssynergia, fistula at the port and port rotation.Clinical SignificanceArtificial urethral sphincter placement is a valid option for treating incontinent male dogs that show an insufficient response or become refractory to medical or other prior surgical management. A high‐complication rate is associated with this procedure.
Male, Dogs, Urinary Incontinence, Urethra, Animals, Urinary Sphincter, Artificial, Ataxia, Female, Dog Diseases
Male, Dogs, Urinary Incontinence, Urethra, Animals, Urinary Sphincter, Artificial, Ataxia, Female, Dog Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
