
doi: 10.1111/jpc.16177
pmid: 36181437
AimDental neglect is the failure of parents to meet a child's basic oral health needs and causes complications. Long screen time, and its health impact, is an important public health issue. This study is aimed at determining whether there is a relationship between screen time of children and parents and dental neglect.MethodsTwo hundred and fifteen patients were included in this cross‐sectional observational study. A questionnaire including questions exploring demographic data, children's life‐styles and, screen time of both parents and children. A dental neglect scale was administered to the parents. The children's intraoral examinations were evaluated using the decayed, missing, filled teeth (dmft) and pulp, ulcers, fistula, abscess (pufa) indices.ResultsMultivariable linear regression analysis showed that dental neglect was statistically significantly associated with brushing teeth unsupervised and infrequently, frequent snacking, rarely doing exercise, screen exposure at an early age and presence of dental plaque (P < 0.05). Long screen time was statistically significantly associated with high dmft scores, reflecting poor oral health. It was found that children who did not attend daycare, had statistically significantly longer exposure to screens, compared to those who attended daycare.ConclusionsEarly exposure to screens and long‐term screen use are associated with adverse outcomes pertaining to children's oral health.
Parents, Screen Time, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Oral Health, Dental Caries, Child
Parents, Screen Time, Cross-Sectional Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Oral Health, Dental Caries, Child
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
