Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Sensory S...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Sensory Studies
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

The Cross‐Modal Interaction of White Pepper Included in a Bread Formulation: An Investigation Using Hedonic Scales and Rate‐All‐That‐Apply

Authors: Deborah Nash; Gabrielle Sloan; Matthew Code; Brianna Power; Matthew B. McSweeney;

The Cross‐Modal Interaction of White Pepper Included in a Bread Formulation: An Investigation Using Hedonic Scales and Rate‐All‐That‐Apply

Abstract

ABSTRACT White pepper is a chemical irritant identified to increase saltiness perception in a liquid food matrix (soup). However, it also leads to off‐flavors and bitterness in soup. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using white pepper in a solid food matrix (bread) to influence saltiness perception. Furthermore, consumer acceptability and sensory perception were investigated. The bread was made with 0.2% (0.2WP), 0.4% (0.4WP), and 0.6% (0.6WP) on a weight per weight basis with the flour. Also, a control bread without white pepper was made. Consumers ( n = 84) evaluated the bread for liking using hedonic scales and their sensory perception using rate‐all‐that‐apply. The 0.2WP sample was liked significantly more than the control. Also, the flavor of the 0.2WP and 0.4WP samples was liked more than the control. The 0.6WP was not significantly different from the control. The 0.2WP and 0.4WP had higher saltiness perception than the control, while the 0.6WP was found to be spicier and increased bitterness in comparison to the control. The addition of the white pepper also impacted the textural perception, with an increasing amount of white pepper the bread was perceived to be harder. Overall, this study identified how white pepper can be used in a solid food matrix to enhance saltiness perception.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities