
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1111/jopr.13185
pmid: 32364656
AbstractPurposeTo determine the prevalence and distribution of prosthetic complications affecting implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs).Materials and MethodsSubjects previously treated with one or more ISFDP(s) were identified from an electronic health record search and recalled for comprehensive clinical examination. Past prosthesis failures and complications were identified from the patient records while any existing complications, not previously recorded, were assessed during examination. ISFDP survival and failure rates were calculated with Kaplan‐Meier curves and life table analysis, while regression Poisson analysis was used to identify associations between outcomes and possible patient‐ and prosthesis‐based risk factors.ResultsSeventy‐four subjects with 107 ISFDPs were enrolled in the study with a mean time between prosthesis delivery and exam of 3.14 years (range: 1.00‐9.00 years). Four prostheses failed, resulting in a cumulative prosthesis survival rate of 96.26%. Prosthetic complications affected 48.59% of ISFDPs, the majority (94.87%) of them minor complications. Only the use of a nightguard was associated with a lower prevalence of prosthetic screw loosening (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02‐0.59, p = 0.007) while no outcome differences were noted for other variables. Patient satisfaction was high regardless of presence or number of complications.ConclusionsISFDPs demonstrated a high survival rate and overall high, patient‐reported satisfaction. Minor prosthetic complications were common but were only significantly associated with nightguard use.
Dental Implants, Survival Rate, Humans, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Prosthesis Failure, Retrospective Studies
Dental Implants, Survival Rate, Humans, Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported, Dental Restoration Failure, Follow-Up Studies, Prosthesis Failure, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
