
doi: 10.1111/jonm.12159
pmid: 23919679
The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of work alienation on organisational commitment, work effort and work-to-family enrichment.There is substantial research on the effects of work alienation on passive job performance, such as organisational commitment. However, studies analysing work alienation on active performance, such as work effort, and outside work, such as work-to-family enrichment, are scarce.Two dimensions of work alienation are considered: powerlessness and meaninglessness. Hypotheses are tested using surveys collected among a national sample of midwives in the Netherlands (respondents: 790, response rate 61%).the findings indicate that work alienation (powerlessness and meaninglessness) influence organisational commitment, work effort and--to a lesser extent--work-to-family enrichment. High work meaninglessness, in particular, has negative effects on these outcomes.When people feel that they have no influence in their work (hence, when they feel 'powerless') and especially when the feel that their work is not worthwhile (when they feel 'meaningless') this has substantial negative effects.Managers should increase the meaningfulness that people attach to their work, thereby maintaining a high-quality workforce. Possible strategies include: (1) improving person-job fit, (2) developing high-quality relationships, (3) better communicating the results people help to deliver.
Employment, Male, Communication, Interprofessional Relations, Midwifery, Organizational Culture, EUR ESSB 25, Nursing Administration Research, Personnel Loyalty, Humans, Regression Analysis, ESSB PA, Female, Nurse Administrators, Power, Psychological
Employment, Male, Communication, Interprofessional Relations, Midwifery, Organizational Culture, EUR ESSB 25, Nursing Administration Research, Personnel Loyalty, Humans, Regression Analysis, ESSB PA, Female, Nurse Administrators, Power, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 81 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
