Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Neuroimag...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Neuroimaging
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Transcranial Doppler Validation Pilot Study

Authors: V, Babikian; M A, Sloan; C H, Tegeler; L D, DeWitt; P B, Fayad; E, Feldmann; C R, Gomez;

Transcranial Doppler Validation Pilot Study

Abstract

The use of transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for the evaluation of patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease remains controversial. This study was organized to gather preliminary data regarding the sensitivity and specificity of TCD when compared to cerebral angiography in detecting stenosing lesions and collateral flow patterns of the anterior cerebral circulation. Forty‐two patients from six medical centers were prospectively enrolled. Each received cerebral angiography and TCD testing within 24 hours of each other. Based on TCD criteria established a priori, the results were first analyzed by a blinded investigator and then by computer. Computerized analyses were then repeated with modified criteria. Collateral flow through the anterior communicating and ophthalmic arteries was detected with sensitivities of 62% and 100%, and specificities of 98% and 92%, respectively. Internal carotid artery proximal and distal severe (> 70%) stenoses were detected with sensitivities of 79% and 1 00% and specificities of 88% and 97%. Middle and anterior cerebral artery stenoses and middle cerebral artery occlusion were detected with specificities exceeding 98%; however, the data were insufficient to determine sensitivity. Computerized analyses did not permit improvement of sensitivity and specificity of the baseline criteria. The selected TCD criteria are highly specific in detecting intracranial stenoses and collateral flow patterns of the anterior circulation. The criteria have limited but acceptable sensitivity and specifity in detecting internal carotid artery origin severe stenoses, and are highly sensitive in detecting ophthalmic artery retrograde flow. A study with a larger sample is necessary to provide definitive guidelines for diagnosis.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Transcranial, Pilot Projects, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Cerebral Angiography, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    47
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
47
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!