
doi: 10.1111/jog.13327
pmid: 28422372
AbstractAimDipstick results for proteinuria are affected by urine concentration, and thus urine creatinine concentration ([Cr]). This study was performed to determine whether spot urine [Cr] changes significantly during pregnancy, leading to a significantly different false‐negative rate (FNR) on dipstick test between trimester.MethodsThe [Cr] and protein concentrations ([P]) were analyzed in 631 spot urine samples with negative/equivocal dipstick from 425 pregnant women. False‐negative dipstick was defined as [P] : [Cr] ratio (P/Cr) > 0.27 mg/mg.ResultsMedian [Cr] was 117 mg/dL (range, 6.5–326 mg/dL), 72 mg/dL (range, 4.3–477 mg/dL), and 73 mg/dL (range, 8.4–396 mg/dL) in the first (n = 96), second (n = 344), and third (n = 191) trimester urine samples, respectively (P = 0.000, Kruskal–Wallis). Both [P] and P/Cr increased significantly with advancing gestation. FNR 9.4% (18/191) in the third trimester was significantly higher than that of 0.0% (0/96) in the second trimester and that of 0.5% (2/344) in the third trimester. In the 20 urine samples with false‐negative dipstick, median [Cr] was 47.0 mg/dL (range, 11.0–358 mg/dL) and the proportion of samples with dilute urine, that is, [Cr] <47 mg/dL, was significantly higher than in the remaining 611 urine samples (50%, 10/20 vs 28%, 174/611, respectively, P = 0.046).ConclusionsUrine samples in the second and third trimesters were more likely to be diluted compared with the first trimester. This was associated with high FNR in third trimester urine samples.
Adult, Young Adult, Pregnancy, Creatinine, Humans, Female, Pregnancy Trimesters, Middle Aged, False Negative Reactions
Adult, Young Adult, Pregnancy, Creatinine, Humans, Female, Pregnancy Trimesters, Middle Aged, False Negative Reactions
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
