Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Cosmetic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparative Study between Nd‐YAG laser, fractional CO2 Laser, and combined Nd‐YAG with fractional CO2 Laser in the Management of keloid: clinical and molecular Study

Authors: Mona Soliman; Yasmeen Etman; Amal AbdElhameed; Radwa Elsharaby; Abeer Tawfik;

Comparative Study between Nd‐YAG laser, fractional CO2 Laser, and combined Nd‐YAG with fractional CO2 Laser in the Management of keloid: clinical and molecular Study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFractional CO2 laser and Nd‐YAG laser have been reported to have promising results in the management of keloids. So far, there have been no comparative studies between these laser modalities.AimsThe study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO2, Nd‐YAG, and a combination of both in the management of keloids.Patients and methodsForty‐five keloid patients were divided into 3 equal groups: the first received fractional CO2 only, the second received Nd‐YAG only, and the third received a combination of both lasers. Each group received its designated treatment every 4 weeks for 4 sessions. The improvement was evaluated by the “Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale” (POSAS). Detection of procollagen I mRNA by RT‐PCR analysis was done.ResultsThe assessment by POSAS showed the most significant clinical improvement in the combination group and a less significant improvement in the fractional CO2 group, while the least improvement was seen in the Nd‐YAG group. Molecular assessment via procollagen I yielded matching results.ConclusionThe study showed that the combination of fractional CO2 and Nd‐YAG lasers has a synergistic effect being the most effective in the management of keloids, fractional CO2 being more effective than ND‐YAG and Nd‐YAG being the least effective.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Treatment Outcome, Keloid, Lasers, Gas, Humans, Lasers, Solid-State

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!