
doi: 10.1111/jocd.12109
pmid: 25399627
SummaryBackgroundIn recent years, there has been a great development of esthetic dermatology as a subspecialty of dermatology. It is important to know to which extent the general population regard this branch of medical surgical specialty as being of interest and contributing to emotional well‐being.ObjectiveTo analyze the technical features of a questionnaire which has been designed to reflect such perception of the general population about esthetic dermatology and its contribution to emotional well‐being.Material and methodProduction and psychometric analysis of a self‐filled in questionnaire in relation to esthetic dermatology and emotional well‐being (DEBIE). This questionnaire is made of 57 items and has been applied to a sample of 770 people within the general population. The drawing‐up process of the questionnaire is described to provide content validity. Items analysis was carried out together with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to assess the structure and construct validity of the tool. The extent of internal consistency (reliability) and concurrent validity has also been verified.ResultsDEBIE questionnaire (Spanish acronym for Aesthetic Dermatology and Emotional Well‐being) revolves around six factors explaining 53.91% of the variance; there is a high level of internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.90) and reasonable criterion validity.ConclusionsDEBIE questionnaire brings together adequate psychometric properties that can be applied to assess the perception that the general population have in relation to esthetic dermatology and its contribution to their emotional well‐being.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Esthetics, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Dermatology, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Image, Humans, Female
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Esthetics, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Dermatology, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Surveys and Questionnaires, Body Image, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
