
doi: 10.1111/jicd.12204
pmid: 26748834
AbstractAimThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of preheating and shade on the surface microhardness of silorane‐based composites.MethodsThree shades of two different types of composites were evaluated: a silorane‐based composite and a methacrylate‐based composite. The composites were tested at 23°C, and after preheating at 55°C. Five specimens were prepared for each experimental group. The top surface of the specimens was irradiated for 20 s using an LED unit. Vickers microhardness test was used to evaluate both top and bottom surfaces of the specimens, followed by 24‐h storage in the dark. Statistical analysis was performed using one‐way anova and Tukey's post‐hoc test at a level of significance of α = 0.05.ResultsThere was a significant rise in microhardness as the temperature increased from 23 to 55°C for both the top and bottom surfaces of the tested composites (P < 0.05). The C2 shade of both composites exhibited the lowest microhardness (P < 0.05), while the A2 and A3 shades did not show significant differences compared to each other (P > 0.05) Filtek Silorane presented significantly lower microhardness than Filtek Z250 (P < 0.05), regardless of the temperature, shade, or depth of measurement.ConclusionsPreheating, shade, and composition of the tested composite resins affected their surface microhardness.
Hot Temperature, Hardness, Surface Properties, Materials Testing, Color, Silorane Resins, Composite Resins
Hot Temperature, Hardness, Surface Properties, Materials Testing, Color, Silorane Resins, Composite Resins
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
