Downloads provided by UsageCounts
AbstractMALDI‐TOF MS was tested for the identification of Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida on isolates grown on two media, cultured at three incubation times and applied on the target plate by the direct sample spotting (DS), by the on‐target extraction (OTE) and by the full extraction (FE) method, in triplicates. The identification of samples grown on blood agar (BA) outperformed identification on tryptic soya agar (TSA) by 0.64% for DS and OTE. The OTE gave the highest scores in both culture media, all incubation times and replicates. Reliable 24‐hr species identification was 61.54%, 84.61% and 53.85% for samples grown on TSA and identified by DS, OTE and FE, respectively. For isolates grown on BA, they were 76.92%, 96.15% and 30.77%, respectively. When identified by OTE, the 48‐hr identification was 93.58%, but for 72 hr declined to 71.79%. The reliable identification with the highest score from the first measurement was 100% only for OTE from BA (24 hr), whereas OTE from TSA gave 84.61% (24 hr), 76.92% (48 hr) and 84.61% (72 hr). The reliable MALDI‐TOF MS identification of Ph. damselae subsp. piscicida is incubation time, media, target plate preparation and replicate‐dependent.
Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida ; MALDI-TOF MS, Photobacterium, MALDI-TOF MS; Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, Sea Bream, Fish Diseases, Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, MALDI-TOF MS, Animals, Bass, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Biology
Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida ; MALDI-TOF MS, Photobacterium, MALDI-TOF MS; Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, Sea Bream, Fish Diseases, Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, MALDI-TOF MS, Animals, Bass, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 100 | |
| downloads | 124 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts