
AbstractRoutine application of antimicrobials is the current treatment of choice for rainbow trout fry syndrome (RTFS) or bacterial coldwater disease (BCWD) caused by Flavobacterium psychrophilum. In this study, the antimicrobial susceptibilities of 133 F. psychrophilum isolates, 118 of which were from the UK, were evaluated by broth microdilution and disc diffusion methods following VET04‐A2 and VET03‐A guidelines of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), respectively. Isolates were categorized as wild type (fully susceptible, WT) or non‐wild type (NWT) using normalized resistance interpretation (NRI)‐determined cut‐off values (COWT). Broth microdilution testing showed that only 12% of UK isolates were WT to oxolinic acid (MIC COWT ≤ 0.25 mg/L) and 42% were WT for oxytetracycline (MIC COWT ≤ 0.25 mg/L). In contrast, all the isolates tested were WT (MIC COWT ≤ 2 mg/L) for florfenicol, the main antimicrobial for RTFS control in the UK. Disc diffusion‐based COWT values were ≥51 mm for 10 μg amoxicillin, ≥44 mm for 30 μg florfenicol, ≥30 mm for 2 μg oxolinic acid and ≥51 mm for 30 μg oxytetracycline. There was a high categorical agreement between the classifications of the isolates by two testing methods for florfenicol (100%), oxytetracycline (93%) and oxolinic acid (99%).
570, rainbow trout fry syndrome, disc diffusion, Salmo salar, 500, broth microdilution, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Oncorhynchus kisutch, Flavobacterium, antimicrobial susceptibility, United Kingdom, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Fish Diseases, Flavobacteriaceae Infections, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, epidemiological cut-off values, Animals
570, rainbow trout fry syndrome, disc diffusion, Salmo salar, 500, broth microdilution, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Oncorhynchus kisutch, Flavobacterium, antimicrobial susceptibility, United Kingdom, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Fish Diseases, Flavobacteriaceae Infections, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Flavobacterium psychrophilum, Drug Resistance, Bacterial, epidemiological cut-off values, Animals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
