
AbstractBackgroundDue to the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic, the risk of quiet quitting among healthcare professionals is increasing. Individuals who engage in the quiet quitting process may also unknowingly become the target of quiet firing. The concepts of quiet quitting and quiet firing play a crucial role in promoting employee resilience and preventing organizational losses.MethodThis study aimed to conduct a validity and reliability analysis of the quiet quitting and quiet firing scale (QQ and QF scale) in Turkish. A methodological study was conducted with 445 healthcare professionals.ResultsThe item‐total score correlation values ranged between 0.37 and 0.76. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 14‐item, two‐factor structure. Cronbach's ⍺ internal consistency coefficient was 0.89. The QQ and QF scale had a strong negative correlation with the person‐organization fit scale and the happiness at work scale subscales of engagement, job satisfaction and affective organizational commitment.ConclusionThe results showed that the adapted version of the QQ and QF scale was valid and suitable for use in Turkey.
Male, Adult, Original Paper, Turkey, Psychometrics, Quiet Firing, SARS-CoV-2, Health Personnel, Healthcare, Reproducibility of Results, COVID-19, Nursing, Middle Aged, Reliability, Job Satisfaction, Validity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Quiet Quitting, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical
Male, Adult, Original Paper, Turkey, Psychometrics, Quiet Firing, SARS-CoV-2, Health Personnel, Healthcare, Reproducibility of Results, COVID-19, Nursing, Middle Aged, Reliability, Job Satisfaction, Validity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Quiet Quitting, Female, Factor Analysis, Statistical
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
