
doi: 10.1111/jedm.12040
As a global measure of precision, item response theory (IRT) estimated reliability is derived for four coefficients (Cronbach's α, Feldt‐Raju, stratified α, and marginal reliability). Models with different underlying assumptions concerning test‐part similarity are discussed. A detailed computational example is presented for the targeted coefficients. A comparison of the IRT model‐derived coefficients is made and the impact of varying ability distributions is evaluated. The advantages of IRT‐derived reliability coefficients for problems such as automated test form assembly and vertical scaling are discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
