
doi: 10.1111/jeb.12985
pmid: 27711983
AbstractAntagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites is a key process in the genesis and maintenance of biological diversity. Whereas coevolutionary dynamics show distinct patterns under favourable environmental conditions, the effects of more realistic, variable conditions are largely unknown. We investigated the impact of a fluctuating environment on antagonistic coevolution in experimental microcosms of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 and lytic phage SBWΦ2. High‐frequency temperature fluctuations caused no deviations from typical coevolutionary arms race dynamics. However, coevolution was stalled during periods of high temperature under intermediate‐ and low‐frequency fluctuations, generating temporary coevolutionary cold spots. Temperature variation affected population density, providing evidence that eco‐evolutionary feedbacks act through variable bacteria–phage encounter rates. Our study shows that environmental fluctuations can drive antagonistic species interactions into and out of coevolutionary cold and hot spots. Whether coevolution persists or stalls depends on the frequency of change and the environmental optima of both interacting players.
570, host-parasite, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Temperature, 612, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Biological Evolution, temperature fluctuations, microcosm, Host-Parasite Interactions, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Cold Temperature, coevolution, phage, experimental evolution, Pseudomonas Phages
570, host-parasite, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Temperature, 612, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Biological Evolution, temperature fluctuations, microcosm, Host-Parasite Interactions, [SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Cold Temperature, coevolution, phage, experimental evolution, Pseudomonas Phages
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
