
The number of clinical practice guidelines is increasing, but their quality is variable.1 However, healthcare professionals/users should be able to rely on methodologically sound guidelines that are helpful and applicable in practice. To objectively assess (methodological) guideline quality, experts developed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Radboudumc 2: Cancer development and immune defence RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dermatology - Radboud University Medical Center, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Skin Diseases, Netherlands
Radboudumc 2: Cancer development and immune defence RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dermatology - Radboud University Medical Center, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Skin Diseases, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
