
doi: 10.1111/jcms.13212
AbstractOur contribution demonstrates and explains the ineffectiveness of European Union (EU) bank resolution rules, a core element of Banking Union. This inadequacy owes in large part to the limited access to and insufficient availability of EU resolution funds and inadequate national deposit guarantee schemes in most EU member states, in conjunction with the relatively high minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) for many EU banks. In many cases, these requirements are unlikely ever to be met – particularly for retail banks most likely to require resolution in the euro periphery. We offer a liberal intergovernmentalist analysis to explain the inadequacy of the EU resolution regime by examining German and French government preferences on EU rules on bank capital requirements agreed earlier in 2013 and national deposit guarantee schemes agreed in 2014. These government preferences were shaped significantly by the preferences of national banks and bank associations.
: Sciences politiques, administration publique & relations internationales [E08] [Droit, criminologie & sciences politiques], banking union, MREL (minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities), single resolution mechanism, liberal intergovernmentalism, Bank recovery and resolution directive, deposit guarantee schemes, : Political science, public administration & international relations [E08] [Law, criminology & political science]
: Sciences politiques, administration publique & relations internationales [E08] [Droit, criminologie & sciences politiques], banking union, MREL (minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities), single resolution mechanism, liberal intergovernmentalism, Bank recovery and resolution directive, deposit guarantee schemes, : Political science, public administration & international relations [E08] [Law, criminology & political science]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
