Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Advanced ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Decent Work Perception and Its Relationship With Work‐Related Flow and Psychological Capital Among Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Authors: Na Zheng; Teng Zhang; Xi‐fei He; Xiu‐qin Zhu;

Decent Work Perception and Its Relationship With Work‐Related Flow and Psychological Capital Among Nurses: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim To examine nurses' perceptions of decent work (defined by the ILO as safe, fair and socially recognised employment) and its relationship with work‐related flow and psychological capital. Design A cross‐sectional survey design. Methods In 2023, we used convenient sampling to select 1930 nurses from 20 high‐grade A hospitals. A general data questionnaire, decent work perception scale (DWPS), work‐related flow inventory (WOLF) and psychological capital scale (PCQ) were used for the survey. Results The total score of the decent work perception scale of 1930 nurses was 49.10 ± 6.18, indicating a low perception of decent work. The total score of the work‐related flow inventory was 108.68 ± 18.5, suggesting a moderate level of work‐related flow, and the total score of the psychological capital scale was 84.64 ± 14.52, indicating a moderate level of psychological capital. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that nurses' perceptions of decent work were positively correlated with work‐related flow ( r = 0.429, p < 0.001) and psychological capital ( r = 0.385, p < 0.001). The multilevel regression analysis showed age, education, workplace violence, income and regional economy significantly influenced decent work perception ( p < 0.01). Work‐related flow ( β = 0.401) and psychological capital ( β = 0.350) remained strong predictors after adjustments ( p < 0.001). Institutional differences explained 18.8% of variance (ICC = 0.188). Conclusion Nurse's decent work perception was at a low level. Decent work perception positively correlated with work‐related flow and psychological capital among nurses. Implications for the Profession Hospitals should enhance organisational support, ensure fair compensation and improve working conditions through shared governance and well‐being initiatives. Strengthening nurses' decision‐making participation, professional pride and psychological resilience is crucial. While systemic challenges exist, incremental reforms like nurse‐led task forces and pilot programmes can foster sustainable improvements. Reporting Method A STROBE checklist. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!