
doi: 10.1111/jan.13030
pmid: 27221701
AbstractAimTo investigate the prevalence of secondary traumatic stress among Emergency nurses in the West of Scotland and explore their experiences of this.BackgroundUnexpected death, trauma and violence are regular occurrences that contribute to the stressful environment nurses working in the Emergency department experience. A potential consequence of repeated exposure to such stressors can be referred to as secondary traumatic stress.DesignTriangulation of methods of data collection, using two distinct phases: Phase 1 – quantitative Phase 2 – qualitative MethodsQuantitative data were collated via postal questionnaire, from a convenience sample of Emergency nurses. Qualitative data were subsequently collated from a focus group constituting of a random sample of these Emergency nurses. Descriptive statistics were computed and thematic analysis conducted. All data were collated during February 2013.Results/findings75% of the sampled Emergency nurses reported at least one secondary traumatic stress symptom in the last week. Participants said that acute occupational stressors such as resuscitation and death were the influencing factors towards this. Strategies such as formal debriefing and social support were cited as beneficial tools for the management of secondary traumatic stress; however, barriers such as time and experience were found to inhibit their common use.ConclusionSecondary traumatic stress is a prevalent phenomenon among Emergency nurses in the West of Scotland and if not managed appropriately, could represent a significant barrier to the mental health of this group and their capacity to provide quality care.
Personnel, Hospital, Scotland, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Social Support, Compassion Fatigue, Emergency Service, Hospital, Stress, Psychological
Personnel, Hospital, Scotland, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Social Support, Compassion Fatigue, Emergency Service, Hospital, Stress, Psychological
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 98 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
