
Three normative models based on the Change Detector analogies of Shallice (1964) are investigated to see how well they account for the integration of input over time that occurs in absolute brightness threshold experiments. Of the three, the geometric moving average receives no support. The perceptual moment and moving average models give about equally satisfactory but not perfect fits for short flash results, but the perceptual moment model is much more satisfactory for long flash results. The analysis takes into account variations in information transmission times, noise in the visual system and the quantal nature of the light input. The locus of temporal integration is discussed and a central locus preferred, following Treisman (1966).
Light, Visual Perception, Humans, Models, Psychological, Mathematics
Light, Visual Perception, Humans, Models, Psychological, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
