<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 6131988
AbstractThe official requirements for sutures in Australia are those of British Pharmacopoeia (B.P.). The results of a survey conducted by this Laboratory indicate that the B.P. test and specifications for knot pull strength are no longer appropriate for sutures currently available in this country. It is suggested that tensile strength measurements on sutures should be carried out, without prior soaking, using the load cell type of constant rate of extension apparatus rather than the pendulum type tester specified in the B.P. Use of a simple knot is suitable for testing synthetic sutures, but the surgeon’s knot is preferred for catgut. All products tested easily met both the B.P. and the United States Pharmacopeia (U.S.P.) requirements for tensile strength.
Pharmacopoeias as Topic, Sutures, Tensile Strength, Australia, United Kingdom, United States
Pharmacopoeias as Topic, Sutures, Tensile Strength, Australia, United Kingdom, United States
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |