<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 19522958
In many patients, the treatment of heart failure (HF) cannot be optimized because of pre‐existing or treatment‐induced hypotension. Midodrine, a peripheral α1‐adrenergic agonist may allow for up‐titration of neurohormonal antagonist therapy leading to improved outcomes. Ten consecutive patients with HF due to systolic dysfunction and symptomatic hypotension interfering with optimal medical therapy were started on midodrine. After a 6‐month follow‐up, a higher percentage of patients were on optimal HF therapy (angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker mg % of optimal dose 20% vs 57.5%; P<.001) (β‐blockers mg % optimal dose 37.5% vs 75%; P<.001) (spironolactone/eplerenone mg % 43.7% vs 95%; P<.001). This led to an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (baseline 24±9.4 vs 32.2±9.9; P<.001) and clinical outcomes, with a significant reduction in total hospital admissions (32 vs 12; P=.02) and total hospital days (150 vs 58; P=.02).
Heart Failure, Male, Systole, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, Myocardial Ischemia, Stroke Volume, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left, Hospitalization, Midodrine, Diastole, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Hypotension, Cardiomyopathies, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
Heart Failure, Male, Systole, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, Myocardial Ischemia, Stroke Volume, Middle Aged, Ventricular Function, Left, Hospitalization, Midodrine, Diastole, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Hypotension, Cardiomyopathies, Adrenergic alpha-Agonists
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |