
handle: 11336/191984
AbstractAncient philosophy knew two main skeptical traditions: the Pyrrhonian and the Academic. In this final paper of the three‐part series devoted to ancient skepticism, I present some of the topics about Academic skepticism which have recently been much debated in the specialist literature. I will be concerned with the outlooks of Arcesilaus, Carneades, and Philo of Larissa.
ARCESILAUS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, ANCIENT SKEPTICISM, CARNEADES, PHILO OF LARISSA
ARCESILAUS, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6, ANCIENT SKEPTICISM, CARNEADES, PHILO OF LARISSA
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
