Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Wound ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
International Wound Journal
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns

Authors: M.C. Peral; Miguel A Huaman Martinez; J. C. Valdez;

Bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus plantarum in burns

Abstract

AbstractBacterial colonisation and infection remain the major causes of delayed healing and graft rejection following burns. Topical treatment is necessary to reduce the incidence of burn wound infection. Silver sulphadiazine (SD‐Ag) is an often used microbicidal agent. However, this treatment produces adverse reactions and side‐effects. On the basis of experimental data and clinical application of lactobacilli as probiotics, we performed this exploratory study to establish the effectiveness of bacteriotherapy with topical application of the innocuous bacteria Lactobacillus plantarum cultured in De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe medium to provide an alternative method for burn treatment using SD‐Ag as a reference. These innocuous bacteria would compete with other bacteria that are wound pathogens and would modify the wound environment and promote tissue repair. Eighty burned patients from the Plastic Surgery and Burns Unit were grouped into infected (delayed) second‐ and third‐degree and non infected (early) third‐degree burns and treated with L. plantarum or SD‐Ag. The proportion of patients with delayed second‐degree burns was 0·71 for L. plantarum and 0·73 for SD‐Ag (relative rate: −2·72%) with respect to the decrease in bacterial load (<105 bacteria/g of tissue), promotion of granulating tissue wound bed and healing. In early third‐degree burns, the values were 0·75 for L. plantarum and 0·84 for SD‐Ag (relative rate: −1·07%) in preventing wound infection and promotion of granulation tissue, 0·90 in graft taking for both treatments (relative rate: 0%) and 0·75 for L. plantarum and 0·77 for SD‐Ag (relative rate: −2·60%) in healing. In delayed third‐degree burns, values were 0·83 for L. plantarum and 0·71 for SD‐Ag (relative rate: +16·90%) with respect to the decrease in the bacterial load (<105 bacteria/g of tissue) and providing a granulating tissue wound bed, 0·90 in graft taking for both treatments (relative rate: 0%) and 0·75 for L. plantarum and 0·64 for SD‐Ag (relative rate: + 17·19%) in healing. Although the number of patients (between 12 and 15 per group) did not enable the application of a power statistical test, these results suggest that the L. plantarum treatment should be studied in greater depth and could be used as a valid alternative for the topical treatment of burns.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Wound Healing, Adolescent, Administration, Topical, Skin Transplantation, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Antibiosis, Wound Infection, Humans, Female, Burns, Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections, Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections, Follow-Up Studies, Lactobacillus plantarum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    145
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
145
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
gold