
pmid: 22805605
AbstractBackground/AimPrediction tools are increasingly used to inform patients about the future dental health outcome. Advanced statistical methods are required to arrive at unbiased predictions based on follow‐up studies.Materials and methodsThe Internet risk calculator at the Dental Trauma Guide provides prognoses for teeth with traumatic injuries based on the Copenhagen trauma database: http://www.dentaltraumaguide.org The database includes 2191 traumatized permanent teeth from 1282 patients that were treated at the dental trauma unit at the University Hospital in Copenhagen (Denmark) in the period between 1972 and 1991. Subgroup analyses and estimates of event probabilities were based on the Kaplan–Meier and the Aalen–Johansen method.ResultsThe Internet risk calculator shows individualized prognoses for the short‐ and long‐term healing outcome of traumatized teeth with the following injuries: concussion, subluxation, extrusion, lateral luxation, intrusion, avulsion, crown fractures without luxation, root fractures and alveolar fractures. The prognoses for pulp necrosis, pulp canal obliteration, infection‐related root resorption, ankylosis, surface resorption, marginal bone loss, and tooth loss were based on the tooth's root development stage and other risk factors at the time of the injury.ConclusionsThis article explains the database, the functionality and the statistical approach of the Internet risk calculator.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Internet, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Jaw Fractures, Alveolar Bone Loss, Dental Pulp Diseases, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Child, Preschool, Alveolar Process, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Internet, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Jaw Fractures, Alveolar Bone Loss, Dental Pulp Diseases, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Child, Preschool, Alveolar Process, Humans, Female, Child, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
