
pmid: 8833461
The chamber scarification test is a predictive human skin irritation test developed to rank the irritation potential of products and ingredients meant for repealed use on normal and diseased skin. 12 products or ingredients can he tested simultaneously on the forearm skin of each volunteer. The test combines with the procedure scratching of the skin at each test site and subsequent closed patch tests with the products, repeated daily for 3 days. The test is performed on groups of human volunteers: a skin irritant substance or products is included in each lest as a positive control, and a compound with low irritant potential as a negative control, to obtain relative characterization of the irritant potential of the unknown products. The outcome of tests with a positive and negative control product used repeatedly in 13 chamber scarification tests over a 7–year period is reported, and shows high reproducibility of the test. Further intra‐individual variation in skin reaction to the 2 control products in 26 volunteers, who participated 2x, is shown, which supports the conclusion that the chamber scarification lest is a useful short‐term human skin irritation test with high reproducibility.
Adult, Male, Chlorhexidine, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Ointments, Forearm, Double-Blind Method, Paraffin, Predictive Value of Tests, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Irritants, Dermatitis, Irritant, Humans, Female, Dermatologic Agents, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Male, Chlorhexidine, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Patch Tests, Ointments, Forearm, Double-Blind Method, Paraffin, Predictive Value of Tests, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Irritants, Dermatitis, Irritant, Humans, Female, Dermatologic Agents, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
